The cluster is only for illumination of the concept. People can come in many forms or people can use all forms. So although in my own blogging, I’m promoting a Virtual/Closed system, I can still acknowledge the value of each of these forms.

Each form, though, being different, may be used for a different purpose and ultimate effect.

Thanks. Models to me, both as a learner and a facilitator, are a way I am able to get a handle on the complexity of things. Of course, any model can never be an accurate reflection of what is being described as it takes away many variables and relationships. Having said that, I find it helpful to understand what it is I am working with by picking out what I see as significant variables and how they relate with one another. Really nothing different from Derek Wenmoth’s 4Cs

What I have done above is really more descriptive rather than prescriptive. And the hierarchical order represents the gradation of the involvement a member gives to the community. The pyramid shape is more a reflection of the fact that while the Designers are usually those with the most commitment (as in investment of time, emotions, effort, and other resources) to the community, the fact of life is that there will be less of them than the Contributors in the same way that there will likely be less Contributors than Browsers.

Where am I going with it? It helps me live with the fact that even when I do a simple transaction online such as a Blog post, many will browse through it, a few will use it and put a link to it, even fewer will comment on it and still even less will take it, give feedback on it and interact with me to possibly create an even better understanding (model) of reality.

Tell me, what value are you deriving from creating such a model? I am facinated by models, and hope to learn more about what you are trying to do with this.